Lickey Hills Panorama
These shots were produced by stitching together 17 portrait shots and then converting the colour to a mono version using Nik’s SEP 2. A lot of processing time!!!
Which do you prefer? Click to enlarge – they really do look better big!
Advertisements
25 Responses to “Lickey Hills Panorama”
I like both photographs Adrian but I think the mono has the edge for me. I’ve not tried to create a panorama yet. What software did you use to stitch the images together?
Thanks, used Photoshop CS3 which does all the hard work for you.
Nice! B&W is so much more dramatic looking, nice job stitching, 17 yikes!
Thanks Christina – think I might have overdone the number of photos to stitch – took so long to process!
What is the final size of this effort?
64mb i think – not that large really!!
Just found the full layer tiff version of the photo which weighed in at 428mb!!
b&w in my opinion, but i’m known to be a bit biased for monotone
I agree, thanks Z
I had a quirky little panoramic camera that I took with us a few times to Europe. The prints were always stunning, but so big, there wasn’t much you could do with them. I was just scanning a few from London to post. They really are fun to look at!!
I like what you did with these – sounds like a lot of work!
Thanks Elisa – look forward to seeing your London panoramas.
The b/w does it for me – more drama; the colour one much more ho hum in comparison.
I agree – but I am prone to mono photography.
Surprisingly I like the B&W more… maybe because I’m on your blog and I’m used to seeing B&W???? 🙂
Thank you – my work here is done!
Superb, just as I thought. Time for me to start stitching I think!!
Thanks Des.
I prefer the B&W one, I love the texture of the clouds, makes it look quite dramatic. Lovely panoramas, very nice
Thank you.
I definitely prefer the mono version, Adrian – it has more content, and a mono take on this subject works very well. Adrian
Thanks Adrian
Me gusta mucho mas en blanco y negro, más potente
Estoy de acuerdo con Manoli
For me, the B&W definitely has more ‘pop’ to it.
Thanks Frank.